Evidence Hub

Risk factors for new vertebral compression fracture following percutaneous vertebral augmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on multivariate logistic regression analysis

Liu S, Sun Y, Man Y, He M, Huang P

Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025

7,743 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

Objective: This meta-analysis investigates the prevalence and risk factors for new vertebral compression fractures (NVCF) following percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA) in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF).

Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science (up to June 2025) and screened case-control and cohort studies that utilized multivariate logistic regression analysis to examine the prevalence and risk factors of NVCF after PVA in OVCF patients. The meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. After data extraction, STATA 15.0 was used to calculate the pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results: This meta-analysis included 18 studies involving 7,743 patients, of whom 1,336 developed NVCF postoperatively, with a prevalence of 17.25%. The meta-analysis revealed that the risk factors for new fractures after PVA in OVCF patients were associated with Gender [OR = 1.99, 95%CI (1.50, 2.64), P < 0.001], Age [OR = 1.09, 95%CI (1.02, 1.17), P = 0.01], Bone mineral density (BMD) [OR = 0.74, 95%CI (0.63, 0.86), P < 0.001],Bone cement disc leakage [OR = 2.94, 95%CI (1.64, 5.28), P < 0.001], Lack of anti-osteoporosis treatment [OR = 2.93, 95%CI (2.14, 4.01), P < 0.001], Thoracolumbar junction (TL junction) [OR = 3.50, 95%CI (2.06, 5.93), P < 0.001], Hounsfield unit value (HU value) [OR = 0.96, 95%CI (0.95, 0.97), P < 0.001], Use of steroids [OR = 3.94, 95%CI (2.16, 7.21), P < 0.001],…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 7,743 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free