Evidence Hub

Association of aberrant mineral metabolic markers with fracture risk in chronic kidney disease: a comprehensive meta-analysis

Liu Y, Zhang ZX, Fu CS, Ye ZB, Jin HM, Yang XH

BMC nephrology, 2025

7 citations

Abstract

Background: This meta-analysis aims to investigate the impact of abnormalities in mineral metabolic markers, including serum phosphate and calcium, intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), and fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) on the risk of fractures in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Methods: A systematic search was conducted across MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials. The outcomes were association of mineral metabolic markers with the risk of fractures in patients with chronic kidney disease. Pooled risk estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using fixed-effects or random-effects models.

Results: Thirty-two studies were included in the meta-analysis. High and low levels of serum phosphate in hemodialysis (HD) patients were both associated with an increased risk of fractures (RR = 1.08, 95% CI 1.02-1.15, P = 0.013; RR = 1.13, 95% CI 1.02-1.25, P = 0.022, respectively). Similarly, abnormal levels of iPTH in CKD patients, both high and low, were associated with increased fracture risk (RR = 1.25, 95% CI 1.20-1.31, P < 0.001; RR = 1.41, 95% CI 1.10-1.82, P = 0.007, respectively). Elevated FGF23 levels were also linked to an increased risk of fractures (RR = 1.32, 95% CI 1.06-1.66, P = 0.015). While a higher level of calcium exhibited a trend towards reduced fracture incidence without statistical significance (RR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.77-1.05, P = 0.181), lower calcium levels…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free