Evidence Hub

Global prevalence, site-specific patterns, and key risk factors for osteoporosis and bone loss in systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Yu C, Hui J, Ding S, Ma X

Frontiers in immunology, 2026

Abstract

Background: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease in which patients have a significantly increased risk of developing osteoporosis (OP) and osteopenia. Despite numerous studies, the global burden of SLE-related OP, its regional distribution patterns and its major risk factors remain poorly quantified and subject to controversy due to heterogeneity in sample sizes, diagnostic criteria and methodologies. To address these gaps in the evidence, we conducted a systematic assessment of the prevalence and risk factors for OP and osteopenia in patients with SLE.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. We performed a comprehensive search of Chinese and English databases, including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI and WANFANG, up to 26 September 2025. We included observational studies that met the diagnostic criteria for SLE and reported the prevalence of OP or reduced bone mass, as well as associated risk factors. Two reviewers independently conducted literature screening, data extraction and quality assessment. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 12.0 software; random-effects or fixed-effects models were employed to pool prevalence rates and odds ratios, and subgroup analysis, meta-regression and sensitivity analysis were used to explore sources of heterogeneity.

Results: A total of 59 studies were included. Meta-analysis revealed an overall prevalence of osteoporosis in SLE patients of 16.70%…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free