Evidence Hub

Does postoperative exercise after hip arthroplasty improve strength and function? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Ye Z, Yu S, Liao L, Zhang Z, Lv L

BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026

1,782 participants

Abstract

Objective: To determine the clinical benefits of structured postoperative exercise on muscle strength, patient-reported function, and range of motion after total hip arthroplasty (THA) for osteoarthritis.

Methods: We searched multiple databases for randomized controlled trials and prospective studies comparing structured exercise versus standard care after primary THA. Pooled effects were calculated using standardized mean differences (SMD) or mean differences (MD) with random‑effects models. Subgroup analyses were stratified by follow‑up duration ( 12 months) and assessed limb (operated vs. healthy).

Results: Twenty‑two studies (1,782 participants) were included. For hip abduction strength, exercise significantly improved short‑term ( 12 months; SMD ‑0.29, 95% CI: ‑0.75 to 0.17). Hip flexion strength showed no significant effect (SMD 0.10, 95% CI: ‑0.27 to 0.47). The Harris Hip Score improved significantly at 2 weeks (MD ‑4.62), 4 weeks (MD ‑7.67), 6 weeks (MD ‑17.83), and 12 weeks (MD ‑3.05), but the 1‑year effect was uncertain (MD ‑17.94, 95% CI: ‑49.13 to 13.25; I²=99.1%). Hip range of motion analysis was inconclusive (I²=94.4%). GRADE certainty was moderate for short‑/mid‑term hip abduction strength and early HHS improvements, and low to very low for other outcomes.

Conclusion: Structured postoperative exercise provides short‑ to mid‑term improvements in hip abduction strength and early patient‑reported function, but long‑term efficacy and effects on hip flexion…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,782 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free