Evidence Hub

Association between dietary acid load and risk of osteoporotic fractures in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Mirzababaei A, Daneshvar M, Basirat V, Asbaghi O, Daneshzad E

BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

Aim: We aimed to systematically review and conduct a meta-analysis of the available evidence about the association between dietary acid load (DAL) and fractures in adults.

Method: Relevant studies were searched through Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar until October 2024. The random-effect model was used to calculate the pooled Odd ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Publication bias was evaluated by statistical test of Egger. Subgroup analyses were conducted by study confounders. Moreover, the quality of studies was asessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale which is designed for observational studies.

Results: Six studies were included in this review. According to the methodological heterogeneity between studies and their different charactristics, we performed the analysis based on random-effect model that indicated a marginally significant association between DAL and risk of fracture (N event = 5275, Pooled OR: 1.10; 95% CI: 0.99-1.21, P = 0.073) (I2 = 12.9%; P = 0.321). According to subgroup analysis, there was no significant association between DAL and risk of fracture in the cross-sectional effect sizes (N event = 337, OR:0.69; 95%CI:0.47-1.00). There was a significant association between DAL and a greater risk of fracture in cohort studies (N event = 4938, OR:1.12; 95%CI:1.03-1.22, P = 0.006). Also, high-quality studies (OR:1.12; 95%CI:1.03-1.22; P = 0.006) showed a significant association between DAL and fracture risk.

Conclusion: DAL was…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free