Evidence Hub

Prevalent osteoporosis and fracture risk in patients with hepatic cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Shirinezhad A, Eshlaghi FM, Salabat D, Azarboo A, Ardakani ZF, Esmaeili S, Hoveidaei AH, Ghaseminejad-Raeini A

BMC gastroenterology, 2025

695,330 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

Background: Hepatic liver cirrhosis can lead to significant systemic complications, including the deterioration of bone health. The resulting bone complications can contribute to a decreased quality of life and increased healthcare burden. This study aimed to systematically review and analyze the risk of osteoporosis, fracture, and changes in bone mineral density (BMD) among patients with hepatic cirrhosis compared to non-cirrhotic healthy controls.

Methods: Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, studies were sourced from MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase up to July 2024, including observational studies that assessed osteoporosis, fracture, and BMD in cirrhotic versus non-cirrhotic patients. Meta-analyses were performed by calculating odds ratios (OR) and standardized mean differences (SMD) of outcomes. Sensitivity analyses and meta-regression were also conducted to explore the robustness and sources of heterogeneity.

Results: The analysis included 21 studies with 76,521 cirrhotic and 695,330 control patients. Cirrhotic patients demonstrated significantly higher odds of osteoporosis (OR = 1.93 [1.84 to 2.03]). Fracture was notably elevated, with cirrhotic patients showing an OR of 2.30 [1.66 to 3.18]. Reductions in BMD were observed in both the lumbar spine (SMD = -0.57[-0.79 to -0.35]) and femoral neck (SMD = -0.41 [-0.71 to -0.12]). Sensitivity analyses confirmed these findings, and meta-regression highlighted that male prevalence impacted these associations in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 695,330 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free