Evidence Hub

Fall Prevention Interventions and Fracture Risk in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Yazan J. Alalwani, M. Aldossari, Layan Adeeb Alzahrani, N. Alhatlani, S. M. Albarrak, Waleed Moosa, Raghad Ali Aloufi, I. Albader et al.

Clinics and Practice, 2026

25,000 participants

Abstract

Introduction: Falls and subsequent fractures represent a major public health concern among older adults. While fall prevention interventions have demonstrated efficacy in reducing falls, their impact on fracture outcomes remains unclear. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. We searched multiple databases up to 7 June 2025 for studies investigating fall prevention interventions and fracture outcomes in community-dwelling older adults. A primary outcome was hip fractures; secondary outcomes included any fractures, falls, and serious fall injuries. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, using random-effects meta-analysis where appropriate. Results: Seventeen studies were included, spanning over 25,000 participants. Interventions included exercise programs, multifactorial approaches, medication optimization, and vitamin D supplementation. For hip fractures, only two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reported extractable outcome data (12,489 participants; 132 events); both showed non-significant reductions favoring intervention (RR 0.80–0.87), precluding pooled meta-analysis. For any fractures, five studies (18,519 participants; 1343 events) demonstrated no significant effect (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.72–1.14; p-value = 0.40) with significant heterogeneity (I2 = 65%). Fall prevention interventions significantly reduced falls across 14 studies. GRADE assessment indicated very low certainty for both…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 25,000 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free