Evidence Hub

Antibiotic Combinations in Bismuth-Containing Quadruple Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Eradication: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Duan M, Teng T, Kong Q, Li Y, Zuo X

Helicobacter, 2025

7,624 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

Background and aims: The rising antibiotic resistance of Helicobacter pylori has led to variability in efficacy of bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (BcQT). This network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to compare the efficacy of antibiotic combinations in first-line BcQT.

Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines with PROSPERO registration (CRD420251005598), we systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between January 1, 2005 and March 21, 2025. Eligible studies were selected by predefined criteria. Dichotomous outcomes included H. pylori eradication rates, adverse events, and compliance, analyzed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% credible intervals (95% CrI) or 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Treatments were ranked via surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).

Results: This NMA included 25 RCTs (n = 7624) evaluating 19 regimens. Amoxicillin-metronidazole ranked highest globally (SUCRA = 0.866) in intention-to-treat analyses and in Asia (SUCRA = 0.851), particularly during 2016-2025 (SUCRA = 0.859; OR = 3.43, 95% CrI 1.17-10.05). Metronidazole-tetracycline was optimal in Europe (SUCRA = 0.969; OR = 2.13, 95% CrI 1.15-3.95), amoxicillin-minocycline in China (SUCRA = 0.733). Notably, regimens including levofloxacin or clarithromycin significantly decreased eradication rates in China (OR = 1.32; 95% CI 1.04-1.66; p = 0.02). Amoxicillin-furazolidone had the poorest adverse events (SUCRA =…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 7,624 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free