Evidence Hub

Effects of macro- and micronutrient intake on bone mineral density, osteoporotic fracture risk, inflammation, and functional rehabilitation outcomes in orthopedic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Lv C, Xiao X, He R

Frontiers in nutrition, 2026

Abstract

Background: Nutritional and therapeutic methods are used to enhance bone health and assist in fracture healing while improving functional ability and reducing inflammation and bettering surgical results. The overall effectiveness of these methods for multiple applications remains unknown. This meta-analysis assessed the impact of various treatments on patients with orthopedic and musculoskeletal disorders.

Methods: The systematic review examined 95 studies which were organized into seven distinct outcome domains. The study used random-effects meta-analysis with inverse variance weighting to determine standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The study used the Jadad scale and Cochrane Risk of Bias and GRADE criteria to evaluate study quality while the researchers used funnel plots and Egger's test to assess publication bias.

Results: Interventions significantly improved BMD (SMD = 0.47; 95% CI: 0.31-0.62; p 2 = 79%), bone turnover markers (SMD = -0.69; 95% CI: -1.17 to -0.20; p = 0.004; I2 = 99%), inflammation/oxidative stress markers (SMD = -1.34; 95% CI: -1.45 to -1.23; p 2 = 0%), and postoperative recovery/metabolic outcomes (SMD = -2.04; 95% CI: -2.31 to -1.77; p 2 = 86%). No significant effects were observed for fracture healing (SMD = -0.43; 95% CI: -0.96-0.10), functional/muscle outcomes (SMD = 0.37; 95% CI: -0.06-0.80), or miscellaneous outcomes (SMD = -0.40; 95% CI: -0.96-0.16).

Conclusion: The study results demonstrate that nutritional…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free