Evidence Hub

Second-to-Fourth Digit (2D:4D) Ratio as A Risk Factor for Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review

Elvan Ö, Vural Doğru B, Kaplan Serin E

American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council, 2026

Abstract

Background: The second-to-fourth digit (2D:4D) ratio is an established marker of prenatal sex hormone exposure and has been associated with various health outcomes across the lifespan. Increasing evidence suggests that developmental factors reflected by the 2D:4D ratio may contribute to susceptibility to musculoskeletal disorders, including osteoarthritis (OA) and osteoporosis (OP).

Aim: This systematic review aimed to synthesize the available evidence regarding the association between 2D:4D ratio and the risk of OA and OP.

Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261439840). A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus between April and May 2026. Observational studies investigating the relationship between 2D:4D ratio and OA or OP related outcomes were included. Study selection, data extraction, and methodological quality assessment were independently performed by three reviewers. Methodological quality was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools.

Results: Nine studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising eight studies on OA and one study on OP. Most studies reported that lower 2D:4D ratios or Type III finger patterns were associated with increased OA risk, greater radiographic severity, and a higher likelihood of severe knee OA requiring joint replacement. Associations were particularly evident for knee and hand OA, with several…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free