Evidence Hub

The impact of high-quality dietary patterns on the prevention of osteoporosis: a meta-analysis of observational studies

Sui J, Yin H, Zhang L, Li J

Frontiers in nutrition, 2025

243,846 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Current prevention and treatment strategies for osteoporosis face limitations such as uncertain long-term efficacy, potential safety concerns, and poor adherence. Given these challenges, dietary interventions have emerged as a possible alternative. This study conducts a meta-analysis to systematically evaluate the association between high-quality dietary patterns and osteoporosis risk. We conducted a systematic search of PubMed and Web of Science databases through March 2025. We included observational studies that examined the association between high-quality dietary patterns (HEI, DASH, AHEI, hPDI, MeDS) and osteoporosis. The study selection followed predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used for quality assessment. A total of 9 articles (including 22 studies) with 243,846 participants were ultimately included. Random-effects model analysis showed that high-quality dietary patterns overall had significant protective effects against osteoporosis (pooled OR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.72-0.94). Subgroup analyses indicated: DASH (OR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.57-0.90) and HEI (OR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.33-0.66) showed significant protective effects. North America (OR = 0.85,95% CI: 0.74-0.97) and Asia (OR = 0.63,95% CI: 0.55-0.72) demonstrated protective effects. A potential protective effect (OR = 0.80,95% CI: 0.70-0.92) was shown in cross-sectional studies. The protective effect was more significant in women (OR = 0.63,95% CI: 0.53-0.74). High-quality…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 243,846 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free