Evidence Hub

What Factors Contribute to the Poor Prognosis of Conservative Treatment for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture (OVCF): A Systematic Review

Ao J, Xu Z, Gao Z, Ge T, Wu J, Li J, Li G, Li Q et al.

Clinical interventions in aging, 2025

4,319 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Background: Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) is a prevalent fragility fracture in older adults, often managed with conservative treatment. However, elderly patients are particularly prone to poor prognoses under conservative management, which warrants early identification. This systematic review aims to summarize the risk factors for poor long-term prognosis in older OVCF patients receiving conservative treatment, facilitating early recognition during initial diagnosis.

Methods: This systematic review followed the PRISMA statement criteria and searched the literature until June 2025. The inclusion criteria were patients with OVCFs who underwent conservative treatment only and had at least three months of follow-up. Poor prognoses include no pain relief, dysfunction, and complications such as collapse, nonunion, and kyphosis deformity. The Newcastle‒Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to screen for articles with a low risk of bias.

Results: This systematic review included 26 articles that met our inclusion criteria. These articles involved 4319 participants (80.2% female), with an average age of 72.91 years. OVCF patients with advanced age, previous spine fracture and steroid medication uses had a poor prognosis. On X-ray, poor prognoses are associated with thoracolumbar involvement, vertebral instability, middle‒column injury, initial fracture parameters, and specific fracture morphology. Additionally, specific MRI signal changes (such as diffuse low-intensity…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 4,319 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free