Evidence Hub

Incidence and Risk Factors for the Development of Stress Fractures in Military Recruits and Qualified Personnel: A Systematic Review

Campbell PG, Pope R, Simas V, Canetti EFD, Schram B, Orr RM

International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025

2 citations

Abstract

Stress fractures are a major force preservation risk in military organisations. Although incidence rates and risk factors have been widely examined, a synthesis of high-quality evidence has been lacking. This review aimed to synthesise findings from studies examining stress fracture incidence and risk factors in military populations. The protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework and reported in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Three databases were searched, and data on incidence, risk factors, and risk ratios were extracted. Study quality was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute appraisal tools. Seventy studies were included. The incidence of stress fractures in military recruit/trainee populations was substantially higher than among qualified personnel (13.7-1713 vs. 2.7-56.9 per 1000 person-years). Fractures occurred most often in the tibia, fibula, and metatarsals. Higher-risk sub-populations included older and female personnel. Recruits/trainees faced additional risks, such as the following: consuming >10 alcoholic drinks per week; underweight BMI; beginning training without prior exercise of ≥3 sessions/week or ≥7 h/week in the previous year; low serum 25(OH)D levels; prior use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; and the initial training stages with the greatest physical loading. Military personnel, particularly recruits, experience high stress fracture incidence, with physical workload and other risk factors contributing to elevated risk.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free