Evidence Hub

Preoperative oral carbohydrate administration in adult elective surgery: protocol heterogeneity, regional practice patterns and evidence gaps-a scoping review

Xiao B, Liu Y, Lu R, Tan R, Zeng X, Lu X, Yang C

Frontiers in nutrition, 2026

Abstract

Objective: This scoping review aimed to map the extent, characteristics and distribution of evidence on preoperative oral carbohydrate administration in adult elective surgical patients. Specifically, we sought to describe publication trends, regional practice patterns, surgical populations, intervention protocols, outcome domains and evidence gaps, thereby informing future standardization and individualized implementation within ERAS pathways.

Methods: Following the Arksey and O'Malley framework for scoping reviews, we searched eight Chinese and English databases including CNKI, Wanfang, PubMed, and Web of Science, to collect original studies published from 2015 to September 2025 on preoperative oral carbohydrate intake. Studies were screened and data extracted according to predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, followed by descriptive analysis.

Results: Eighty-two studies were included, comprising 76 randomized controlled trials and 6 non-randomized studies. Most studies were conducted in China and other Asian settings, and more than two-thirds were published after 2020. The commonly reported regimen involved 200-400 mL of a carbohydrate-containing clear fluid administered 2-3 h before surgery, although formulation, dose, timing and control conditions varied substantially across studies. Outcomes were mapped into five domains: metabolic responses, patient comfort, inflammatory or stress markers, clinical recovery and safety. Most included studies reported…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free