Evidence Hub

An Open-Label, Multicenter, Multinational, Centrally Randomized, Two-Arm Parallel-Group Study to Demonstrate the Non-Inferiority in Clinical Efficacy of Levofloxacin 750mg od in Comparison With Piperacillin/Tazobactam 4g/500mg Every 8 Hours in the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia Adult Patients in Both General Wards and ICU (Intensive Care Unit)

ClinicalTrials.gov · COMPLETED, 2007

460 participants

Abstract

Primary Objective:

* The primary objective of the study is to demonstrate the non-inferiority in clinical efficacy at the test of cure (TOC) visit planned 5-7 days after treatment completion of levofloxacin 750 mg once daily (od) in comparison with piperacillin/tazobactam 4 g/500 mg every 8 hours in treating adult patients suffering from mild to moderate hospital-acquired pneumonia.

Secondary Objectives:

The secondary objectives of the study are:

* To assess the bacteriological efficacy at the test of cure (TOC) visit

* To assess the clinical and bacteriological efficacy at the end of study (EOS) visit, 28 to 32 days after treatment ends

* To assess the tolerability of both drugs

Conditions: Pneumonia.

Primary outcome: Clinical efficacy data:-Infection related signs and symptoms-Chest X-ray.

Enrollment: 460 participants.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 460 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free