Evidence Hub

Cholecystectomy and the risk of osteoporosis and fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Guoming Sun, Jianjun Shen, Hongying Tang, Jian Yao, Limin Huang, Yangri Duan, Zhaoxu Tian

Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

Background: Cholecystectomy is a common surgical procedure for gallbladder diseases. Removal of the gallbladder alters bile flow and may affect the absorption of fat-soluble vitamins, especially vitamin D, which could influence bone metabolism. However, epidemiological studies have yielded inconsistent findings regarding its association with osteoporosis and fractures. Objectives: To systematically evaluate the association between cholecystectomy and the risks of osteoporosis and fractures, and to examine potential effect modification by age. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, cohort studies published up to June 1, 2025, were identified through comprehensive searches of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. Eligible studies compared individuals who underwent cholecystectomy with non-surgical controls and reported outcomes of osteoporosis or fractures. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to age and adjustment for confounders. Results: Four high-quality cohort studies, including more than 1.5 million participants, were eligible. Meta-analysis demonstrated a modest but statistically significant increase in fracture risk after cholecystectomy (pooled HR = 1.07; 95% CI, 1.05–1.10;…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free