Evidence Hub

Abstract 13520: Empagliflozin Reduces Markers of Arterial Stiffness, Vascular Resistance and Cardiac Workload in EMPA-REG OUTCOME

R. Chilton, L. Gullestad, D. Fitchett, S. Inzucchi, M. Mattheus, H. Woerle, O. Johansen

Circulation, 2016

2,345 participants · 9 citations

Abstract

Introduction:

In EMPA-REG OUTCOME

®

, empagliflozin added to standard of care in patients with type 2 diabetes and established vascular disease, significantly reduced the primary composite outcome of CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction or non-fatal stroke, a result driven mainly by a 38% reduction in CV death. We aimed to assess the vascular effects of empagliflozin in the trial, beyond its recognized effects in reducing systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP).

Hypothesis:

We hypothesized that empagliflozin reduced 1) pulse pressure (PP), a vascular marker of arterial stiffness determined by the cardiac output, the stiffness of elastic central arteries and wave reflection (PP = SBP - DBP), 2) mean arterial pressure (MAP), a measure reflecting the cardiac cycle determined by the cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance, and central venous pressure (MAP = ([2 x diastolic BP]+ systolic BP)/3), and 3) the double product (DP), a marker of cardiac workload and an indirect measure of myocardial oxygen demand (DP = heart rate x SBP).

Methods:

Patients with type 2 diabetes and high CV risk were randomised to receive placebo, empagliflozin 10 mg, or empagliflozin 25 mg in addition to standard of care. We analysed changes from baseline to week 164 for SBP, DBP, HR, PP, MAP and DP, between treatment and placebo groups using a mixed model repeated measures analysis.

Results:

In total, 2333, 2345 and 2342 patients received placebo, empagliflozin 10 mg and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 2,345 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free