Evidence Hub

Inappropriate vitamin D supplementation among multimorbid older patients: a multicountry analysis

Moutzouri E, Beglinger S, Feller M, Eichenberger A, Dalleur O, Knol W, Emmelot-Vonk M, O'Mahony D et al.

BMC geriatrics, 2025

681 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of vitamin D supplementation and the percentage of participants with a lack of appropriate vitamin D supplementation ("potential underuse") or potentially inappropriate vitamin D supplementation ("potential overuse") and risk factors for these are currently unclear.

METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis from the OPERAM study, a multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial in four European countries (Belgium, Ireland, The Netherlands, Switzerland) including multimorbid (≥ 3 chronic conditions) older patients, with polypharmacy (≥ 5 chronic medications). For the definition of potential underuse and overuse we used high-risk conditions, which were defined according to the START criteria (version 2) for potential prescribing omissions in older people i.e., E2) long-term systemic corticosteroid therapy, known osteoporosis or osteopenia, E3) previous fragility fractures, and E5) housebound/in nursing homes or experiencing falls. We used mixed effect logistic regression to identify factors associated with underuse and overuse.

RESULTS: 2008 patients (79.4y, SD 6.3, 45% female) were included. 825/2008 (41.1%) were supplemented with vitamin D. We identified 681 participants with potential underuse (33.9% of all participants, 69.7% of non-vitamin D users) and 204 with potential overuse (10.2% of all participants, 24.7% of vitamin D users). In the multivariable logistic regression analysis increasing age and being male were associated with underuse, while the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 681 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free