Evidence Hub

Quantitative ultrasound of bone and clodronate effects in thalassemia-induced osteoporosis

Pennisi P, Pizzarelli G, Spina M, Riccobene S, Fiore CE

Journal of bone and mineral metabolism, 2003

30 participants

Abstract

Osteoporosis in beta-thalassemia major has emerged as a topic of interest since optimized transfusion regimens have increased life expectancy and quality in these patients. Although the pathogenesis of thalassemic osteopathy is multifactorial, the evidence of an increased resorption phase suggests that the use of antiresorptive drugs such as bisphosphonates can be considered a valuable therapeutic strategy to reduce bone turnover and the risk of fragility fractures. We compared the effects of long-term cyclical clodronate therapy (300 mg intravenous infusion every 3 weeks for 2 years) and of an active placebo (calcium 1 vitamin D) on bone mass and bone turnover in 30 male patients with beta-thalassemia major. We also tested the possibility of using quantitative ultrasound (QUS) for assessing bone involvement in thalassemic osteopenia and in monitoring the response to antiresorptive therapy. Broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) was significantly reduced in patients with beta-thalassemia major as compared to healthy controls. In calcium and vitamin D-treated patients, a significant decline in spine, femoral, and total body areal bone density was observed. In the patients given intravenous clodronate we measured a substantial stability of bone mass, which was not significantly changed at the end of the study. The urinary excretion of deoxypyridinoline (a marker of bone resorption) showed a progressive significant decline throughout the study period in clodronate-treated…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 30 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free