Evidence Hub

Fixation using Alternative Implants for the Treatment of Hip Fractures (FAITH-2): The Clinical Outcomes of a Multi-Centre 2x2 Factorial Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial in Young Femoral Neck Fracture Patients

G. Slobogean, S. Sprague, S. Bzovsky, T. Scott, L. Thabane, D. Heels-Ansdell, R. O'Toole, Andrea Howe et al.

Journal of Orthopaedics and Trauma, 2020

91 participants · 17 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether fixation method and vitamin D supplementation impact the risk of patient important outcomes within 12 months of injury in non-geriatric femoral neck fracture patients.

DESIGN

Pilot factorial randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

15 North American clinical sites.

PARTICIPANTS

91 adults aged 18-60 years with a femoral neck fracture requiring surgical fixation.

INTERVENTION

Participants were randomized to a surgical intervention (sliding hip screw or cancellous screws) and a vitamin D intervention (vitamin D3 4,000 IU daily versus placebo for 6 months).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The primary clinical outcome was a composite of patient important complications (re-operation, femoral head osteonecrosis, severe femoral neck malunion, nonunion). Secondary outcomes included fracture healing complications and radiographic fracture healing.

RESULTS

86 participants with a mean age of 41 years were included. We found no statistically significant difference in the risk of patient important outcomes between the surgical treatment arms (hazard ratio (HR) 0.90, 95% CI 0.40-2.02, p=0.80) and vitamin D supplementation treatment arms (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.42- 2.18, p=0.92).

CONCLUSIONS

These pilot trial results continue to describe the results of current fixation implants, inform the challenges of improving outcomes in this fracture population, and may guide future vitamin D trials to improve healing outcomes in young fracture populations. Although the pilot trial was not…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 91 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free