Evidence Hub

Dual impact of Ashwagandha: Significant cortisol reduction but no effects on perceived stress - A systematic review and meta-analysis

Albalawi AA

Nutrition and health, 2025

488 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Background The global medicine market is projected to reach US$417 billion by 2033, reflecting rising demand for natural healthcare alternatives. Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera) is widely used in Ayurvedic medicine for stress management, but evidence supporting its efficacy remains inconsistent. Aim This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated Ashwagandha's impact on cortisol levels (a biological stress marker) and perceived stress via Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) scores across randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Method PRISMA guidelines were followed. Four databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and Scopus) were searched for studies from January 2012 to February 2024, yielding seven studies on cortisol and six on perceived stress (n = 488 participants). Inclusion criteria were RCTs longer than or equal to two weeks, oral doses ≥250 mg/day, and reporting cortisol and PSS outcomes. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Results There was a statistically significant reduction in cortisol levels (−1.16 µg/dL, 95% CI: −1.64 to −0.69, P < 0.001). No significant impact was observed on perceived stress (SMD = −0.355, 95% CI: −1.188 to 0.47; P = 0.40). Heterogeneity was moderate (I2 = 50.9%). However, no statistically significant impact was observed on perceived stress (SMD = −0.355, 95% CI: −1.188 to 0.47; P-value = 0.40). The heterogeneity among studies was moderate (I2 = 50.9%). Risk of bias was generally moderate; most studies reported…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 488 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free