Evidence Hub

Safety of 12-Months Administration of Ashwagandha ( Withania somnifera ) Standardized Root Extract in Healthy Adults: A Prospective, Observational Study

Salve J, Kale S, Prajapati BL, Sparavigna A, Savant M, Ademola J, Langade D

Phytotherapy research : PTR, 2026

191 participants · 9 citations

Abstract

Ashwagandha, an adaptogen, is an important herb of Ayurveda used as a Rasayana for its various health benefits. This prospective, multi-center, observational clinical study evaluates the safety (clinical and laboratory) of a standardized Ashwagandha Root Extract (ARE) on long-term administration over 12 months. Male and female adults (N = 191) aged between 18 and 65 years were included in the study. Clinical assessments were done at baseline, followed by monthly for 12 months, whereas laboratory and other study assessments were done at baseline, 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome was the clinical adverse events reported by the patients, whereas secondary outcomes were Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale (CGI-I), health-related Short Form-12 Quality of Life (SF-12 QoL), and laboratory estimations of serum for cortisol, hepatic, renal, and thyroid function. ARE administration for 12 months reported 18 mild adverse events, which were resolved without intervention. The study reported no clinical significant changes in serum alanine transaminases (baseline: 31.31 ± 9.28 IU/L, end of study: 33.68 ± 6.80 IU/L), aspartate transaminases (baseline: 30.61 ± 7.18 IU/L, end of study: 29.02 ± 4.63 IU/L). Serum cortisol levels decreased significantly (p < 0.001), while lipid profile and plasma glucose levels remained unaffected. Serum testosterone (free and total) significantly increased (p < 0.05). SF-12 scores demonstrated significant improvements at 12 months (p < 0.001),…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 191 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free