Evidence Hub

Effectiveness and Safety of Bedaquiline-Containing Modified Shorter Regimens for Multidrug- or Rifampicin-Resistant Tuberculosis: A Single-Arm Meta-Analysis

Zhou Y, Niu H

Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2026

8,166 participants

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a global public health emergency, with multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) and rifampicin-resistant TB (RR-TB) posing critical challenges. Conventional longer regimens are characterized by suboptimal effectiveness, high toxicity, and poor tolerability. Consequently, there is an urgent demand for more effective, safer, shorter regimens with enhanced tolerability to replace traditional treatments. The present study aimed to systematically assess the effectiveness and safety of bedaquiline-containing modified shorter regimens (adaptations of the WHO-recommended 9-12-month bedaquiline-containing shorter regimen, with ethionamide, ethambutol, isoniazid, and pyrazinamide partially or fully substituted by linezolid, cycloserine/terizidone, and/or delamanid) for MDR/RR-TB. Databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science) were searched up to 17 December 2025. Data on treatment success, adverse events, and patient characteristics were extracted. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochrane Q test and I2 statistic. Eleven studies involving 8166 patients were included. The pooled treatment success rate was 78.5% (95% CI: 0.69~0.87, I2: 98.45%; p = 0.00). The incidence of serious adverse events was 10.0%. Bedaquiline-containing modified shorter regimens may offer a potentially viable treatment option for MDR/RR-TB patients, giving an option for patients who are ineligible for standardized regimens. In order to verify these findings, further large-scale…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 8,166 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free