Evidence Hub

Sex Differences in Basal Cortisol Levels Across Body Fluid Compartments in a Cross-sectional Study of Healthy Adults

Katharine J. Liang, E. Colasurdo, Ge Li, J. Shofer, D. Galasko, Joseph F. Quinn, M. Farlow, E. Peskind

Journal of the Endocrine Society, 2024

157 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Context

Many studies have moved toward saliva and peripheral blood sampling for studying cortisol, even in relation to disorders of the brain. However, the degree to which peripheral cortisol reflects central cortisol levels has yet to be comprehensively described. Data describing the effect that biological characteristics such as age and sex have on cortisol levels across compartments is also limited.

Objective

To assess the relationships of cortisol levels across cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), saliva, and plasma (total and free) compartments and describe the effects of age and sex on these relationships.

Design

Multisite cross-sectional observation study.

Setting

Samples collected in academic outpatient settings in 2001-2004.

Patients or Other Participants

Healthy community volunteers (n = 157) of both sexes, aged 20-85 years.

Interventions

None.

Main Outcome Measures

This study was a secondary analysis of data collected from a previously published study.

Results

CSF cortisol correlated more strongly with plasma (r = 0.49, P < .0001) than with saliva cortisol levels. Sex but not age was a significant modifier of these relationships. CSF cortisol levels trended higher with older age in men (R2 = 0.31, P < .001) but not women. Age-related cortisol binding globulin trends differed by sex but did not correlate with sex differences in cortisol levels in any compartment.

Conclusion

Variability in the correlations between central and peripheral cortisol discourages the use of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 157 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free