Evidence Hub

Clinical parameters in patients with halitosis: a cross-sectional study

A. Jazzar, Hebah AlDehlawi, A. Farag, Sana Alhamed, Sara Akeel, Yasmin Mair, Kenana Flemban, Hidaya Alqassab et al.

Frontiers in Dental Medicine, 2024

40 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

Background Halitosis, a socially and psychologically impactful condition often resulting from oral or systemic issues, is exacerbated by factors like aging, poor oral hygiene, and dietary choices. This study aimed to investigate the association between halitosis and stress by measuring salivary cortisol levels and the Cohen's Perceived Stress Scale (CPSS). Methods A cross-sectional study of 40 participants was conducted using questionnaires and clinical measurements to assess halitosis and stress levels. Saliva samples were collected and analyzed for cortisol using ELISA. Participants’ stress was assessed with the Cohen's Perceived Stress Scale Questionnaire (CPSS-10) questionnaire, and halitosis was measured with a Halimeter and self-assessment questionnaire. Clinical measurements included Plaque Index (PI) and the Decayed, Missing, and Filled Teeth (DMFT) score. Results Forty subjects were split into a halitosis group (mean age 30.75 ± 10.15) and group with no halitosis (mean age 26 ± 5.3). Objective measures confirmed higher halitosis scores (3.70 ± 0.73) in the halitosis group vs. the second group (2.60 ± 1.67). Compared with the group with no halitosis, the halitosis group exhibited significantly (p < 0.05) more plaque (27.92% ± 17.16% vs. 47.50 ± 33.57%; p < 0.05) and higher DMFT scores (10.10 ± 2.51 vs. 26 ± 5.30), respectively. Salivary cortisol levels were similar across groups (1.721 ng/ml halitosis, 1.781 ng/ml without halitosis). Correlations showed a moderate…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 40 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free