Evidence Hub

Use of a hypercaloric and hyperprotein supplement enriched with immunonutrients in multi-pathological malnourished patients to improve the incidence and prevalence of pressure sores: A randomized controlled trial

Sánchez-Sánchez E, Díaz-Jiménez J, García-García A, Úbeda-Iglesias A, Muñoz-Tejada B, Martínez-Diegues J, Sánchez-Fernández C, Erola-Moreno M et al.

PloS one, 2026

Abstract

Background: Predisposing factors for the development of pressure-related injuries (PRIs) include the presence of chronic diseases, polypharmacy, immobility and malnutrition. Nutrients such as arginine play an essential role in wound healing.

Methods and findings: A single-blind randomized controlled trial was carried out. Intervention group received a complete hyperproteic and hypercaloric oral nutritional supplement with a fiber mixture enriched in omega 3, L-arginine and nucleotides, providing vitamin C and Zinc, and the control group received a hyperproteic and hypercaloric oral nutritional supplement with fiber mixture.

Results: Descriptive analysis indicated a lower frequency of PRIs at 15 and 30 days in the Atémpero® group compared to the control group, although these differences did not reach statistical significance. However, both improved at the end of the study. In addition, the high risk decreased in both groups, with a higher decrease in the Atémpero® group (72.5% vs 40.9%), as well as the categorization and parameters of the PUSH scale, with a reduction of the same in the Atémpero® group.

Conclusions: While statistical significance was not achieved, the observed trends in PUSH scale scores and clinical observations within the Atémpero® group suggest areas for further investigation. These preliminary data highlight a potential avenue for the nutritional management of multi-pathological patients, establishing a solid foundation for future large-scale confirmatory…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free