Evidence Hub

Comparative bone histomorphometry effects of combined denosumab and teriparatide vs monotherapy in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial

Ramchand SK, Tsai JN, Zhao Y, Hershman SH, Tobert DG, Lee H, Martins JS, David NL et al.

Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2026

13 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

Combined treatment with PTH receptor stimulation (teriparatide 20-μg) and RANKL inhibition (denosumab 60-mg) increases spine and hip BMD and improves estimates of bone strength to a greater extent than either monotherapy. The mechanisms underlying the enhanced efficacy of this combination, however, are not fully defined. In this randomized, 3-arm interventional trial, postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were randomized to receive denosumab 60-mg (n = 9), teriparatide 20-μg (n = 13), or both (n = 12) for 3 mo. Participants received double fluorochrome labeling and underwent a single iliac crest bone biopsy at month 3. A total of 26 bone biopsies were suitable for histomorphometry. Fluorescence microscopy was utilized to differentiate remodeling-based from modeling-based bone formation in the cancellous and endocortical envelopes by identifying the morphology of underlying cement lines as either scalloped or smooth, respectively. Within-subject 3-mo changes from baseline were compared among the 3 treatment groups using one-way ANOVA. At 3 mo, teriparatide significantly increased histomorphometric indices of bone formation (BFR/BS, MS/BS, and dLS/BS) compared to denosumab or combination therapy, consistent with its greater effect on bone formation markers. Although both remodeling- and modeling-based bone formation increased in the combination group, denosumab attenuated the teriparatide-induced increases bone in formation, except for modeling-based bone formation in the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 13 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free