Evidence Hub

Effectiveness of treatment initiation for secondary fracture prevention in the older population: Japanese Bone-fracture Osteoporosis in Late-stage population Database study (J-BOLD) - emulation of a randomized target trial

Tsukamoto M, Hamasaki T, Okimoto N, Saito Y, Fujiwara S

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2025

203,534 participants

Abstract

Initiating osteoporosis medication within 3 months after fracture reduces secondary fractures, particularly hip fractures, in individuals aged ≥ 75 years. This finding highlights the importance of early and sustained treatment in older populations.

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of initiating osteoporosis medication within 3 months after a fracture and continuing it for at least 6 months in preventing secondary fractures among individuals aged ≥ 75 years.

Methods: This study used a targeted trial design, emulating a randomized controlled trial with Japanese administrative claims data from 2014-2022. Among 203,534 individuals with recent osteoporotic fractures, 40,063 initiated osteoporosis medication within 3 months (exposed), while 163,471 did not (controls). High-dimensional propensity score matching identified 53,436 individuals (26,718 exposed and 26,718 controls) for analysis. Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for secondary fractures at any and specific sites.

Results: The study population had a mean age of 83.7 years and included 77.9% women. After ≥ 6 months of treatment, HRs for any fracture were 0.71 (95% CI: 0.60-0.86) in men and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.71-0.88) in women. For hip fractures, HRs were 0.56 (95% CI: 0.36-0.80) in men and 0.60 (95% CI 0.49-0.72) in women. After ≥ 12 months of treatment, HRs for any fracture were 0.65 (95% CI: 0.48-0.82) in men and 0.74 (95% CI: 0.68-0.85) in women. For hip fractures,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 203,534 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free