Evidence Hub

Efficacy of Vitamin D3 Supplementation in Elevating Circulating 25(OH)D Concentration in Individuals With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury (VitD-SCI): Evidence From a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Hertig-Godeschalk A, Brinkhof MWG, Perret C, Scheel-Sailer A, Flueck JL

Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation, 2025

42 participants

Abstract

Background: Individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) are at increased risk for insufficient 25(OH)D levels and associated adverse health outcomes, highlighting the need for vitamin D supplementation. However, the optimal dosing strategy for vitamin D supplementation in this population remains unclear.

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of medium-dose (MD) and high-dose (HD) vitamin D3 supplementation in raising 25(OH)D levels above the sufficiency threshold of 75 nmol/L in individuals with SCI.

Methods: A 12-month randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, superiority clinical trial was conducted in 42 individuals living with SCI for at least 3 years and who had insufficient 25(OH)D levels at baseline. Participants (7 female, 35 male; age 48 ± 10 years; 32 with paraplegia, 10 with tetraplegia) were randomly assigned to the placebo, MD intervention (24,000 IU D3 once every 4 weeks), or HD intervention (24,000 IU D3 once every 2 weeks) group. Baseline 25(OH)D levels (43 ± 16 nmol/L) did not differ between intervention groups (P = .8).

Results: Supplementation was well tolerated, and 25(OH)D levels remained well below the excess threshold. A dose-response effect on 25(OH)D levels was observed [F(2, 40) = 8.21, P < .001]. In the HD group, 46% of the participants reached sufficient levels. Participants having an incomplete lesion, higher baseline 25(OH)D levels, lower body mass index, supplementation during summer, autumn, or winter, or higher sun scores were more likely to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 42 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free