Evidence Hub

Psychosocial outcomes following dual-task high-velocity exercise training in older adults: a secondary analysis of an 18-month cluster randomized controlled trial

Tait JL, Duckham RL, Rantalainen T, Milte CM, Main LC, Nowson CA, Sanders KM, Taaffe DR et al.

The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2026

Abstract

Objectives: Power and resistance training can improve older adults' perceived health, and while cognitive training has mixed benefits, combined effects remain uncertain. This secondary analysis of an 18-month cluster randomized controlled trial investigated whether dual-task functional power training (DT-FPT) improves psychosocial outcomes in older adults at risk for falls.

Methods: Twenty-two independent-living retirement communities (300 residents, ≥65 years) were randomized to 12 months of group-based DT-FPT (6 months supervised + 6 months maintenance; 2/week, 45-60 min) performed with cognitive and/or motor tasks or control (CON), followed by a 6-month follow-up. Health-related quality of life (HR-QoL; SF-36v2), life satisfaction (Personal Wellbeing Index), and psychological distress (Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale [DASS-21]) were assessed at baseline, 6, 12, and 18 months, generating subscale, summary, and composite scores.

Results: Overall, 227 (76%) participants provided data at the 18-month follow-up; mean exercise adherence was 50% at 6 months and 40% at 12 months. At 6 months, DT-FPT showed net benefits compared to CON for physical functioning (1.77 points [95% CI: 0.03, 3.51]; p = .047), role-physical (2.71 [0.35, 5.08]; p = .025), and role-emotional (2.25 [0.09, 4.40]; p = .041) HR-QoL domains. No changes were observed in life satisfaction or psychological distress, but CON showed lower Anxiety DASS-21 subscale scores than DT-FPT at 12 months (-2.0 [-3.22,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free