Evidence Hub

Randomized crossover comparison of two teriparatide self-injection regimens for primary osteoporosis: final report of the Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial 06 (JOINT-06)

Tanaka S, Uemura Y, Tanaka S, Takeuchi Y, Endo N, Takada J, Ikeda S, Iwamoto J et al.

Journal of bone and mineral metabolism, 2025

358 participants

Abstract

Introduction: Although bone anabolic agents such as teriparatide are effective for osteoporosis, satisfaction and adherence may vary by regimen. This multicenter study assessed long-term satisfaction, persistence, efficacy, and safety in postmenopausal women with primary osteoporosis treated with alternating daily and twice-weekly teriparatide over 52 weeks, followed by a final free-choice treatment period.

Materials and methods: In a randomized, open-label, crossover study, 358 postmenopausal women at high risk for fracture were assigned to receive once-daily (20 µg) or twice-weekly (28.2 µg) subcutaneous teriparatide for 26 weeks, then crossed over to the alternative regimen for another 26 weeks. Afterwards, 233 patients entered a 52-week free-choice period under their preferred regimen.

Results: Among the 233 patients entering the free-choice period, 162 chose twice-weekly and 71 chose daily teriparatide. Persistence at 104 weeks was 90.1% for twice-weekly and 88.7% for daily groups (p = 0.749). Overall and treatment satisfaction between groups did not differ significantly at 104 weeks (p > 0.05). Fracture incidence was low and similar (2.8% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.758). Patients in both groups showed significant increases in bone mineral density at L2-L4 and the femoral neck (p < 0.05). Adverse events were infrequent and non-severe.

Conclusions: Patient satisfaction and efficacy were maintained with both teriparatide regimens over 104 weeks, and persistence improved during the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 358 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free