Evidence Hub

Calcitriol supplementation after kidney transplantation: results of a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Khairallah P, Cortez NE, McMahon DJ, Sammons S, Agarwal S, Crew RJ, Cohen DJ, Dube GK et al.

Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2025

67 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

A significant number of kidney transplant recipients have low BMD. We hypothesized that calcitriol administration over the first year posttransplantation would protect the cortical skeleton in recipients managed without corticosteroids by suppressing PTH and bone remodeling. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 67 participants aged ≥18 yr on corticosteroid-sparing immunosuppressive regimen were randomized to daily calcitriol 0.5 μg or placebo for 12 mo after transplantation. The primary endpoint was the percent change in cortical density at the radius and tibia from pre- to postcalcitriol treatment compared to placebo as measured by HR-pQCT. Areal BMD was measured by DXA. Cortical and trabecular volumetric BMD and microarchitecture and total estimated bone strength were measured by HR-pQCT. Blood samples for bone metabolic markers were obtained at baseline, 1- and 12 mo. All primary analyses were intent to treat. Safety was assessed for hypercalcemia and progression of vascular calcifications. Thirty-two participants received calcitriol and 29 received placebo; 27 and 27 participants completed the study, respectively. Most participants were male and Caucasian. Baseline Z-scores at all sites were within 0.5 SD of the general population. At 12 mo posttransplantation, there were no between-group differences in areal BMD, volumetric BMD, microarchitecture or bone strength, or serum levels of bone markers. Participants with versus without bone loss had a blunted…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 67 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free