Evidence Hub

Efficacy of long-term oral nutritional supplementation with dietary counseling on growth, body composition and bone mineralization in children with or at risk for undernutrition: a randomized controlled trial

Ow MYL, Tran NT, Berde Y, Nguyen TS, Tran VK, Jablonka MJ, Baggs GE, Huynh DTT

Nutrition journal, 2025

330 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Background: Impaired growth, accompanied by low lean mass and poor bone mineralization in undernourished children, is linked to adverse short- and long-term health outcomes. Oral nutritional supplements (ONS) promote catch-up growth, but their efficacy in improving lean mass and bone mineralization remains uninvestigated. This study aims to compare the efficacy of long-term ONS with dietary counseling (DC) versus DC alone on growth, body composition, bone mineralization, and health outcomes in children with or at risk of undernutrition.

Methods: Children (n = 330) aged 24-60 months with WHO Growth Standard z-scores of weight-for-age < - 1, height-for-age < - 1, and weight-for-height < 0 were randomized in a multisite controlled trial to receive two servings of a complete and balanced ONS formula with DC, or DC-only, for 240 days. Anthropometric measurements, dietary intake, and parent-reported measures of illness-related and other health outcomes were assessed at baseline and days 30, 120, and 240. Dual X-ray absorptiometry-assessed body composition and bone mineralization, and nutritional blood biomarkers were measured at baseline and day 240.

Results: ONS supplementation augmented growth in height and weight through day 240, with increasing between-group differences over visits (P < 0.01 for treatment-by-visit interaction in height, weight, height-for-age and weight-for-age z-scores). Energy and protein intake levels were 26% and 22% higher, respectively, in the ONS + DC…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 330 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free