Evidence Hub

Effects of Peanut Butter Supplementation on Older Adults' Physical Function: A 6-Month Randomised Controlled Trial

Feyesa I, Hettiarachchi J, Daly RM, George ES, Georgousopoulou EN, Scott D, Baguley BJ, Abbott G et al.

Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2026

60 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: Nut consumption has been associated with a reduced risk of functional decline, but evidence from randomised controlled trials to support functional benefit is lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate whether daily supplementation of peanut butter over 6 months, relative to usual care, can improve physical function in community-dwelling older adults.

Methods: One hundred and twenty older adults (aged ≥ 65 years) at risk of falls were randomly assigned to receive peanut butter (43 g/day, n = 60) or maintain usual care (control, n = 60) for 6 months. Outcomes assessed at baseline and 6 months included physical function (4-m gait speed [primary outcome], standing balance test, four-square step test [FSST], five times sit-to-stand [5STS] test time and muscle power, 30-s sit-to-stand (30-s STS) and timed up and go [TUG] tests), muscle strength (handgrip [HGS] and isometric knee extensor strength tests [KES]) and anthropometry/body composition (weight, body mass index [BMI], total lean and fat mass and appendicular lean mass). Linear regression models, adjusting for age, sex, baseline value of the dependent variable, BMI, physical activity and diet quality, estimated intention-to-treat intervention effects.

Results: A total of 108 (90%) participants completed the study. At baseline, 70% were female, and the mean ± SD age and BMI were 76.1 ± 4.6 years and 27.5 ± 4.2 kg/m2, respectively. At 6 months, there were no significant treatment effects on the primary…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 60 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free