Evidence Hub

Resistance profile and influence factors of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) causing infections in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Yang X, Lou Z, Wang X, Li Z, Liu Q, Guo K, Yang Y, Gong L et al.

Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials, 2025

779 participants · 8 citations

Abstract

The prevalence of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infections has surged in China over the past decade, posing a significant public health concern. However, comprehensive data on CRKP antimicrobial resistance patterns and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on these patterns in China remain unclear. We conducted a systematic review of CRKP infections in China, utilizing data from PubMed spanning 2006 to July 2023. We focused on resistance rates of CRKP causing infections, examining variations across time, regions, and age groups, as well as factors contributing to antimicrobial resistance. Our analysis included 68 studies from 19 provinces in China, comprising 1,284 CRKP isolates obtained from 779 patients. The overall mortality rate for CRKP infections in China was 27% (95% CI: 0.14–0.41, I 2 = 73%, k = 47), with ST11 being the predominant sequence type (Pooled Rate: 80%, 95% CI: 0.67–0.90, I 2 = 86%, k = 31). Temporal and spatial analyses indicated increased resistance to ciprofloxacin (Random effects model: Q b = 9.88, df = 1, P < 0.010) and levofloxacin (Random effects model: Q b = 7.69, df = 1, P < 0.010) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Resistance to chloramphenicol (Random effects model: Q b = 4.97, df = 1, P = 0.030) and ceftazidime-avibactam (Random effects model: Q b = 8.58, df = 1, P < 0.010) was lower in southern regions, while tetracycline resistance (Random effects model: Q b = 9.69, df = 1, P < 0.010) was lower in the north. Higher resistance…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 779 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free