Evidence Hub

Recent important clinical trials of drugs in osteoporosis

Doggrell SA

Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy, 2004

Abstract

The antiresorptive therapies (raloxifene, bisphosphonates) commonly used to treat postmenopausal osteoporotic women, reduce the rate of bone remodeling and lowers the fracture rate, but do not increase bone mass. Strontium ranelate has the advantage of also stimulating bone formation. In the Spinal Osteoporosis Intervention study, at the end of 1 year, there was a lower incidence of fractures in the strontium ranelate group than the placebo group (12.2 and 6.4%, placebo and strontium, respectively) and this difference was maintained over the 3 years (32.8 and 20.9%, placebo and strontium, respectively). With the demise of oestrogen treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis, it is useful that strontium ranelate is emerging as a promising drug in this condition. Secondary osteoporosis (e.g., due to glucocorticoid treatment after cardiac transplantation) tends to be more severe than primary osteoporosis. In a recent trial comparing calcitriol to alendronate after cardiac transplantation, both showed similar abilities to prevent bone loss. As hypercalcaemia is a relatively common adverse effect with calcitriol in the treatment of secondary osteoporosis, requiring monitoring of calcium levels, alendronate is the easier agent to use.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free