Evidence Hub

Antibiotic resistance and bacterial co-infections in COVID-19 patients in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis of hospitalized and non-hospitalized cases

Najafi-Olya Z, Heydarifard Z, Looha MA, Ahmadi AS, Yarhamadi N, Safaei M

BMC infectious diseases, 2025

19 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in Iran, where up to 100% of hospitalized patients received antibiotics despite low bacterial co-infection rates. However, no comprehensive review has evaluated the burden of bacterial co-infections, antibiotic resistance (AR), and multi-drug resistance (MDR) across both hospitalized and non-hospitalized Iranian COVID-19 patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the prevalence of bacterial infections, AR, and MDR during the COVID-19 era in Iran. METHODS: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we systematically searched MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Iranian regional databases for studies published from January 2020 to March 2025. The review protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework (OSF; https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/SCBRX ). Fifteen studies comprising 36,403 COVID-19 patients—33,989 inpatients (including 22,875 treated in intensive-care units) and 2,414 outpatients—met the inclusion criteria. We combined results from multiple studies to determine overall rates of bacterial infections, antibiotic resistance, and multi-drug resistance, using methods that account for differences between studies. RESULTS: The pooled prevalence of bacterial co-infection among Iranian COVID-19 patients was 19.6% (95% CI: 17.8–21.4%) across hospitalized and non-hospitalized settings. Among hospitalized patients, secondary bacterial infections were predominantly…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 19 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free