Evidence Hub

Longitudinal Evaluation of Bone Safety in Children and Adolescents With HIV-1 Starting Tenofovir Alafenamide-Containing Antiretroviral Therapy

Natukunda E, Gaur AH, Deville JG, Kosalaraksa P, Strehlau R, Castaño E, Liberty A, Crowe S et al.

Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, 2025

169 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: Adult participants taking tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) in clinical trials had a better bone safety profile than those taking tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. Herein, we report medium- to long-term effects of TAF-containing regimens on bone health in children and adolescents with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).

Methods: This post hoc pooled analysis of data from 2 phase 2/3 clinical studies (NCT01854775 and NCT02285114) evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of TAF-based regimens in children and adolescents with HIV-1. Participants were categorized into group 1 (aged 12 to < 18 years, weighing ≥ 35 kg), group 2 (aged 6 to < 12 years, weighing ≥ 25 kg), and group 3 (aged ≥ 2 years, weighing 14 to < 25 kg). Evaluations included virologic suppression, height Z-score, Tanner stage, bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine and total body less head (TBLH; absolute and height-for-age Z-score adjusted [HAZ-adjusted] for both), bone serum markers, bone-related adverse events, and pharmacokinetic assessments.

Results: Overall, 169 participants were enrolled and treated (78, 61, and 30 in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively). Median (range) exposure to study drug was 320.3 (8.3-492.3), 290.1 (24.0-393.9), and 168.3 (9.0-193.0) weeks in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Virologic suppression (HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL) rates were high across all groups. Spine and TBLH absolute BMD increased over time in all groups, and spine and TBLH HAZ-adjusted BMD Z-scores…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 169 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free