Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of treatment regimens for drug-resistant tuberculosis in different regions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Geng X, Zhang F, Liu R, Zhang F, Li Z, Li L

BMC infectious diseases, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) remains a formidable public health challenge, posing a significant threat to human life and health security. Comprehensive comparative evidence on the efficacy and safety of various DR-TB treatment strategies remains limited. This study aimed to systematically evaluate and compare the effectiveness of different DR-TB treatment regimens and to assess their safety profiles based on the frequency of adverse events and drug-specific reactions. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase for relevant studies published between 2006 and 2025. Data on drug-resistant tuberculosis and treatment regimens were extracted. Pooled rates and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Publication bias was assessed using Begg’s and Egger’s tests. RESULTS: A total of 97 studies were included for systematic review and meta-analysis. This analysis found that Europe had the highest cure rate for DR-TB (84%; 95% CI: 76%-91%). The cure rate was highest for the 6-month treatment regimen (BPaL) (93%; 95% CI: 88%-96%), followed by the HRZE treatment regimen (86%; 95% CI: 82%-89%), and the lowest for the 18–24 month long-term treatment regimen including injectable agents (62%; 95% CI: 55%-70%). The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was 65% (95% CI: 50%-78%), and the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) was 17% (95% CI: 12%-24%). The BPaL regimen was associated with a lower incidence of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free