Evidence Hub

Acalabrutinib in Waldenström macroglobulinemia yields durable responses with 5 years of follow-up

Owen RG, McCarthy H, D'Sa S, Thomas SK, Tournilhac O, Forconi F, Kersten MJ, Zinzani PL et al.

Blood advances, 2026

106 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Abstract: Acalabrutinib is a covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor. In the phase 2 ACE-WM-001 trial, at 27.4-month median follow-up, acalabrutinib yielded durable responses in patients with treatment-naive (TN) or relapsed/refractory (R/R) Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM). We report WM-001 results at 63.7-month median follow-up. Overall, 106 patients (TN, n = 14; R/R, n = 92) were treated; 52.8% discontinued treatment (TN, n = 7; R/R, n = 49), most commonly because of disease progression (19.8%; TN, n = 1; R/R, n = 20) and adverse events (AEs; 17.9%; TN, n = 4; R/R, n = 15). Overall response rates were 92.9% and 94.6%, and major response rates (partial response or better) were 78.6% and 81.5% in the TN and R/R cohorts, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not estimable (NE; 95% confidence interval, 19.3 to NE) and 67.5 months (53.3 to NE), with estimated 66-month PFS rates of 83.6% (48.0-95.7) and 52.0% (39.3-63.2) in the TN and R/R cohorts, respectively. Median duration of response (DOR) was not reached (NR) (11.9 months to NE) and 64.7 months (54.5 to NE), with estimated 66-month DOR rates of 90.0% (47.3-98.5) and 44.8% (27.1-61.1) in the TN and R/R cohorts, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was NR in both cohorts; estimated 66-month OS rates were 90.9% (50.8-98.7) and 71.2% (60.3-79.6), respectively. Cardiac events of clinical interest occurred in 22 (20.8%) patients. One grade 5 AE (intracranial hematoma) was considered treatment…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 106 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free