Evidence Hub

Development and evaluation of a clinical pharmacist-led full-course management model for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in orthopedic trauma patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Ni R, Huang P, Gao Z, Lu D, Huang L, Xie H, Jiang Z, Wu Z

Trials, 2026

Abstract

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common and potentially fatal complication in orthopedic trauma patients, particularly following lower limb and hip-related fractures. While pharmacological prophylaxis is the cornerstone of prevention for patients at moderate to high risk, its use is a balance between efficacy and bleeding risk. Clinical pharmacists play an increasingly important role in optimizing pharmacotherapy, but evidence for the effectiveness of a comprehensive, pharmacist-led management model spanning both inpatient and outpatient care for VTE prophylaxis in this population is scarce.

Methods: This is a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial. One hundred seventy eligible orthopedic trauma patients at risk for VTE will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention group or the control group. The intervention group will receive a pharmacist-led, full-course management model, which includes personalized VTE risk (Caprini score) and bleeding risk assessment, medication reconciliation, patient education, dosing optimization, adverse event monitoring, and structured follow-up via telephone at 21, 35, and 90 days post-discharge. The control group will receive standard medical care without this structured pharmacist intervention. The primary outcome is the incidence of symptomatic and asymptomatic VTE within 90 days post-surgery. Secondary outcomes include the incidence of major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding events,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free