Evidence Hub

Preliminary study on nutritional and exercise strategies to prevent and reverse sarcopenia in aging: an open-label single-arm trial

Wang B, He S, Nong C, Zhang J, Li W, Wei Y, Liu P, Wang F et al.

Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition, 2025

46 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background and objectives: Sarcopenia is the progressive loss of muscle mass and strength that can adversely affect an individual's health and quality of life. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a combined nutritional and exercise intervention among older adults who were at risk of sarcopenia.

Methods and study design: 46 older adults were included in a 30±3 days intervention that combined oral nutritional supplements with resistance exercise. Parameters were measured at baseline (day 0) and after intervention (day 30±3), including routine parameters of sarcopenia, blood tests, and body measurements. The ITT analysis method was used, and the data were analysed using paired t-tests/paired Wilcoxon test, and ANOVA.

Results: Among the 46 participants, there were no significant changes in hip circumference (HC), muscle mass of both lower limbs, appendicular skeletal muscle mass index (ASMI), and hemoglobin (Hb) after intervention. However, both hand grip strength (GS) significantly increased, as did muscle mass of both upper limbs and the total muscle strength. Blood tests showed a slight increase in albumin (ALB) levels and a significant increase in 25-OH-D levels, while the waist (WC) and calf circumferences (CC) also increased significantly after intervention. Somatic motor performance improved significantly in the 6-meter walk and 5 sit-ups tests.

Conclusions: The combined nutritional and exercise intervention was feasible and effective in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 46 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free