Evidence Hub

Efficacy and Safety of Pharmaceutically Manufactured Cannabidiol in Recurrent Pericarditis: A Phase II Clinical Trial

Luis SA, Klein AL, Cremer PC, Abbate A, Salik JR, Thomas GK, Haider SW, Hagerty TE et al.

Journal of the American Heart Association, 2026

27 participants

Abstract

Background: Recurrent pericarditis may be mediated through inappropriate activation of the NACHT, leucine-rich repeat, and pyrin domain-containing protein 3 inflammasome. Pharmaceutically manufactured cannabidiol is an oral formulation that inhibits NACHT, leucine-rich repeat, and pyrin domain-containing protein 3 inflammasome activation and development of pericarditis in a preclinical model.

Methods: This Phase 2, open-label, multicenter trial included adult patients with symptomatic recurrent pericarditis: pericarditis chest pain ≥4 on an 11-point numerical rating scale with an elevated C-reactive protein (≥1 mg/dL) or at least mild pericardial inflammation on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. At enrollment, patients were on stable doses of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, colchicine, and/or corticosteroids. Cannabidiol was administered during an 8-week treatment period and an optional 18-week extension period when background therapy was tapered and discontinued. The primary efficacy end point was change in patient-reported pericarditis pain. Secondary end points included normalization of C-reactive protein and percentage of patients with recurrences.

Results: Among 27 patients (18 women, mean age 53 years), baseline maximal numerical rating scale pain score was 5.8±1.7, and 10 patients had elevated C-reactive protein. At Week 8, maximal numerical rating scale pain score was 2.1±1.8, and median time to numerical rating scale score ≤2 was 5 days. Among the 10…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 27 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free