Evidence Hub

Bone health in juvenile idiopathic arthritis compared with controls based on a Norwegian observational study

Lundestad A, Cetrelli L, Angenete OW, Augdal TA, Tylleskär K, Nordal EB, Rosendahl K, Hoftun GB et al.

RMD open, 2025

205 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: Children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) are at risk for impaired bone health. This study evaluates bone mineral density (BMD) and potential risk factors for reduced BMD.

Methods: In the NorJIA study, Norwegian children with JIA, and age-matched and sex-matched controls participated in a multicentre cohort study with clinical examinations, questionnaires, imaging and blood tests. BMD was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and adjusted for bone age. Standard descriptive statistics and t-tests were used.

Results: 205 children with JIA had BMD measured at two study visits, 2 years apart and 125 controls at the second visit. At visit 2, median age was 14.7 years (IQR 11.5-16.6). Median disease duration was 6.6 (IQR 4.7-10.4) years, 50.7% had used or were currently using biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and 25.9% had ever used systemic steroids. There were no substantial differences in BMD Z-scores between the JIA group and controls. Mean BMD Z-score L1-L4 in JIA was 0.0 (95% CI -0.1, 0.1) and in controls 0.1 (95% CI -0.1, 0.3). A robust association was seen between physical activity levels and BMD. In children with JIA, the mean BMD Z-score L1-L4 was -0.3 (95% CI -0.6, 0.0) in the low-activity group and 0.2 (95% CI 0.0, 0.4) in the high-activity group, with a similar trend in controls. Children with JIA were as physically active as controls.

Conclusions: BMD Z-scores in JIA were similar to controls and positively associated with…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 205 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free