Evidence Hub

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and immunogenicity of HLX14 versus reference denosumab in healthy males: A randomized phase I study

Li N, Chu N, Zhu L, Wu X, Wei Q, Wang J, Hu X, Yu H et al.

Clinical and translational science, 2024

3 citations

Abstract

Denosumab is a human IgG2 monoclonal antibody against receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL) for the treatment of osteoporosis and bone loss. HLX14 is a proposed biosimilar of denosumab. This randomized, parallel-group, two-part, phase I study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and immunogenicity of HLX14 with reference denosumab in Chinese healthy adult male participants. In Part 1, participants were randomized 1:1 and given HLX14 or reference denosumab sourced from the European Union (EU). In double-blind Part 2, participants were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive HLX14 or denosumab sourced from the United States, EU, or China. All study drugs were administered via subcutaneous injection at a single dose of 60 mg. The primary endpoints were area under the serum drug concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last concentration-quantifiable time t (AUC0-t), maximum serum drug concentration (Cmax), and area under the serum drug concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0-inf). Twenty-four participants were randomized in Part 1 and 228 in Part 2. The 90% confidence intervals of geometric mean ratio of AUC0-t, Cmax, and AUC0-inf between HLX14 and denosumab from different sources fell within the pre-specified similarity margins of 0.80-1.25 (AUC0-t, 0.91-1.13; Cmax, 0.91-1.13; AUC0-inf, 0.91-1.12), demonstrating pharmacokinetic similarity. No notable difference was observed among treatment groups in pharmacodynamics,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free