Evidence Hub

Comparison of biodegradable and metal occluders in patients with PFO and migraine: study design and rationale of BioMetal Trial

Li Z, Dong J, Dong J, Yan Y, Gao M, Fang F, Zhang F, Ouyang W et al.

Trials, 2025

400 participants

Abstract

Background: The association between migraine and patent foramen ovale (PFO) has led to investigations into percutaneous PFO closure as a potential therapeutic avenue. While existing trials with metal occluders have shown promise in reducing migraine burden, concerns over long-term complications and the impact of metal devices on migraine exacerbation have prompted the development of biodegradable alternatives.

Methods: The Comparison of Biodegradable and Metal Occluders in Patients with PFO and Migraine (BioMetal) trial is a prospective, multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled, superiority study comparing a biodegradable occluder with a nickel-titanium alloy occluder in PFO patients with medication-refractory migraine with aura (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06203873). A total of 400 participants will be enrolled, randomized 1:1 to receive either the biodegradable or metal devices, and followed up for 24 months post-randomization. The primary endpoint is the change in monthly migraine days at 12 months compared to baseline.

Discussion: The BioMetal trial aims to address the ongoing debate surrounding PFO closure for migraine relief by evaluating the efficacy and safety of biodegradable versus metal devices, with the goal of providing valuable insights into the optimal approach for PFO closure in PFO patients with medication-refractory migraine with aura. The potential implications extend beyond migraine management, highlighting the significance of biocompatible…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 400 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free