Evidence Hub

A Multicentric Clinical Study to Evaluate Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy, and Safety of Immune Globulin Subcutaneous 20% Weekly/Biweekly Dosing in Treatment-Experienced Patients and Loading/Weekly Maintenance Dosing in Treatment-Naïve Patients with Primary Immunodeficiency

Lumry WR, Palumbo M, Hsu C, Hussain I, McNeil D, Bridges T, Wedner HJ, Scarupa M et al.

Journal of clinical immunology, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy is a well-documented and effective treatment for primary immunodeficiencies (PI). Subcutaneous immunoglobulins (SCIG) have emerged as an effective alternative for some patients that offers additional flexibility.Currently, caprylate/chromatography purified IGSC (human) 20% is approved to treat PI in North America and many countries worldwide. In this multi-center, open-label study, the pharmacokinetics (PK), efficacy, and safety of IGSC 20% were studied after biweekly (every two weeks) dosing for 16 weeks and compared to weekly IGSC 20% administration for 16 weeks in treatment-experienced PI patients. A loading/weekly maintenance SC regimen was also studied in PI patients naïve to IG treatment.In treatment-experienced patients, the least squares mean ratio of steady-state AUC0−7 days for biweekly dosing showed non-inferiority to weekly dosing (90% confidence interval 1.0030–1.0685). Other PK parameters (Cmax, Tmax, steady state trough) were similar between treatments. Efficacy and safety measures were qualitatively similar to previously published results. No serious bacterial infections were reported. Annual rates for any type of infection were similar between the treatment groups. All severe treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were unrelated to treatment. Only mild to moderate suspected adverse drug reactions were observed.PK analyses showed that biweekly dosing of IGSC 20% was non-inferior to weekly dosing in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free