Evidence Hub

Incidence and determinants of fracture risk in 8,348 Mongolian schoolchildren: secondary analysis of data from a randomised controlled trial

Casson B, Jolliffe DA, Ariunbuyan S, Delgerekh B, Turmunkh T, Buyanjargal U, Martineau AR, Ganmaa D

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025

1,456 participants

Abstract

ABSTRACT:

Background: Data on incidence and determinants of fracture risk among children living in non-Western settings are limited. The predictive value of radial quantitative ultrasound (QUS) for fracture risk in children remains uncertain.

Methods: We conducted secondary analyses of data from 8,348 schoolchildren aged 6-13 years living in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia, who participated in a population-based randomised controlled trial of vitamin D supplementation with 3-year follow-up. Radial speed-of-sound (SOS) was measured at baseline in a subset of 1,456 children. Multivariable Poisson regression was used to estimate fracture incidence, identify determinants of fracture risk, and test whether radial SOS measurements predicted fracture risk.

Results: A total of 614 fractures occurred in 521 children over 24,719.3 person-years of follow-up. Overall fracture incidence was 24.9 per 1,000 person-years (95% CI 22.9 to 26.9). Fracture risk was higher in boys vs. girls (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR] 2.10, 95% CI 1.77 to 2.49, P<0.0001) and in older vs. younger children (aIRR 1.18 per additional year of age, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.24, P<0.0001), peaking at age 14 in both boys (87.4 fractures per 1,000 boys per year, 95% CI 63.3 to 117.8) and girls (24.9 fractures per 1,000 girls per year, 95% CI 12.4 to 44.5, respectively). Fracture risk was also higher in children who smoked tobacco vs. those who did not (aIRR 2.20, 95% CI 1.09 to 4.43, P=0.03), while children whose parents were…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,456 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free