Evidence Hub

Prophylactic fluoroquinolones in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: A meta-analytic comparison of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin

Albalawi MAH, Al-Sayaghi KM, Hegazy SM, Merghani MM, Osman NM, Abdelmagid LO, Mohammed HM, Ibrahim MM et al.

Medicine, 2025

4 citations

Abstract

Background: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a critical therapeutic intervention for hematological malignancies. However, infections remain a leading complication. Fluoroquinolones, particularly ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin, are commonly employed as prophylactic agents. This study compares their efficacy in preventing post-HSCT infections.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using the Cochrane and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Relevant studies comparing ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin in HSCT recipients were identified from biomedical databases. Randomized controlled trials and retrospective cohort studies were included. Data extraction encompassed patient demographics, intervention details, and infection outcomes. Meta-analyses employed RevMan software, using risk ratios (RR) and mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results: Five studies involving 1202 HSCT recipients (597 ciprofloxacin; 605 levofloxacin) were analyzed. Levofloxacin showed superior efficacy in reducing bloodstream infections (BSI) (RR = 1.61; 95% CI: [1.04, 2.49]; P = .03) and specifically gram-positive BSI (RR = 1.60; 95% CI: [1.09, 2.36]; P = .02). Both agents demonstrated similar effectiveness in preventing febrile neutropenia (RR = 0.99; P = .96), gram-negative BSI (RR = 0.99; P = .99), pneumonia (RR = 1.24; P = .7), and all-cause mortality (RR = 1.05; P = .7). Hospital stay duration was also…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free