Evidence Hub

Vitamin D Status and Multisystem Health Outcomes at 5-6 Years in Very-Low-Birth-Weight Preterm and Term-Born Children: A Cross-Sectional Secondary Analysis of Two Prospective Cohorts

Tsai YS, Lin YC, Tseng KT, Chang JH, Jim WT, Peng CC, Chang HY

Nutrients, 2026

213 participants

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Vitamin D deficiency is common in children, but its associations with growth and organ function remain unclear. This cross-sectional secondary analysis of two prospective cohort studies evaluated vitamin D status and multisystem health outcomes in very-low-birth-weight preterm and term children aged 5-6 years. Methods: Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] was categorized as deficiency (30 ng/mL). Assessments included anthropometry, blood pressure, body composition and bone mineral density, pulmonary function, cardiac indices, kidney and metabolic biomarkers, and cognitive function (preterm children only). Results: Overall, 213 children (144 preterm, 69 term) were included; only 17.8% achieved sufficient vitamin D levels. No statistically significant associations were detected between serum 25(OH)D and any of these outcomes. In contrast, 25(OH)D levels were positively correlated with physical activity, sun exposure, and vitamin D supplementation (all p Conclusions: Vitamin D deficiency was common, but no statistically significant associations with multisystem health measures were detected; several features of this analysis limit the strength of these null findings. Sun exposure, physical activity, and vitamin D supplementation were associated with higher 25(OH)D concentrations. These exploratory cross-sectional findings require confirmation in prospectively designed studies.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 213 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free